← Services
DevSecOps Security Assessment
Review of CI/CD pipelines, tooling, and security practices in the software delivery lifecycle. For engineering and security leads who want to identify gaps in SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets management, and deployment security without prescribing a single vendor or stack.
Pricing: €3,000 – €8,000
Service overview
- Review of CI/CD pipelines, security tooling, and practices in the build–deploy lifecycle.
- For engineering and security leads adopting or maturing DevSecOps (SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets, deployment).
- Solves: secrets in pipelines, overprivileged CI, missing or weak security gates, and unverified artifacts reaching production.
Typical security risks discovered
- Secrets in pipelines: credentials in logs, env vars, or unsecured parameter stores; no rotation or scoping.
- Overprivileged CI identities: pipeline roles with broad write or deploy rights; no least privilege.
- Missing or weak security gates: no SAST/DAST/SCA in pipeline; critical findings not blocking or visible.
- Unverified artifacts: images or binaries deployed without signing or provenance checks.
- Insufficient dependency and image scanning: outdated or vulnerable dependencies and base images in production.
- Deployment and config drift: sensitive config in repos; no separation of build and production secrets.
Assessment scope
- CI/CD pipeline design: build, test, and deploy stages; where security tools run and how failures are handled.
- Secrets management: how credentials are injected, who can access them, rotation and audit.
- SAST, DAST, SCA: coverage, quality of rules, integration with pipeline and ticketing.
- Container and image security: base images, scanning, signing, and admission at deploy time.
- Deployment and production: who can deploy, how config and secrets are delivered, change control.
- Visibility and response: logging, alerting, and ownership for pipeline and deployment security.
Deliverables
- Pipeline and process security report with findings and risk ratings.
- Recommendations for tooling and process (framework-agnostic where possible).
- Prioritised improvement list (quick wins vs. longer-term changes).
- Implementation guidance: where to integrate checks, how to avoid blocking delivery unnecessarily.
- Optional follow-up to validate improvements.
Expected outcomes
- Clear picture of where the pipeline is exposed (secrets, permissions, missing gates) and how to fix it.
- Prioritised improvements so engineering can adopt SAST, DAST, SCA, and secrets handling in stages.
- Reduced risk of credential leakage, malicious builds, or vulnerable artifacts in production.
- Optional follow-up to confirm critical gaps are addressed.